Capital.com vs Forex.com: which broker is better in 2026?
We compare Capital.com and Forex.com — two forex & CFD brokers — side by side across regulation, fees, platforms, minimum deposit, and our editorial scores. Both score evenly overall — the right choice depends on which criteria matter most to you.
Side-by-side comparison
CriteriaCapital.comForex.com
Overall score 3.8 3.8
Regulation & safety 4.0 4.0
Fees & deposit 3.5 3.5
Platform & assets 4.0 4.0
User support 3.5 3.5
Trust score76/10076/100
Minimum depositVaries by account type — check the official siteVaries by account type — check the official site
Demo accountAvailableAvailable
PlatformsCapital.com web/mobile platform, MetaTrader 4, TradingView (integrated)Proprietary web/desktop platform, MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, TradingView (integrated), Mobile app
Fee modelSpread model (no commission) — variesSpread model or spread + commission (RAW/Commission account) — varies per region/account; exact figures not yet verified
Pros & cons
- Tier-1 regulation (FCA/CySEC/ASIC) + a modern AI-powered platform
- Thousands of CFD markets + MT4 & TradingView
- Beginner-friendly interface + education
- CFDs only (no real stocks/asset ownership)
- Entity/product availability differs per region
- Leveraged CFDs are high-risk
- Backed by StoneX Group (US public company Nasdaq: SNEX) + a strict US market license
- Full platform selection: proprietary + MT4/MT5 + TradingView
- Broad instrument coverage & established liquidity
- Fees/spreads aren't always the cheapest compared to raw ECN brokers
- Product availability differs per entity/region
- Leveraged products are high-risk
Regulation at a glance
Capital.com
Regulated by the FCA (UK), CySEC (Cyprus), ASIC (Australia), SCB (Bahamas), FSA (Seychelles). CFD focus with an AI-powered platform.
Forex.com
Part of StoneX Group, a US public company (Nasdaq: SNEX). Entities regulated by NFA/CFTC (US), FCA (UK), ASIC (Australia), IIROC (Canada), and others per region.