Capital.com vs Fusion Markets: which broker is better in 2026?
We compare Capital.com and Fusion Markets — two forex & CFD brokers — side by side across regulation, fees, platforms, minimum deposit, and our editorial scores. Based on our overall editorial score, Fusion Markets edges ahead (3.9/5), but the right choice depends on what matters most to you — check the breakdown below.
Side-by-side comparison
CriteriaCapital.comFusion Markets
Overall score 3.8 3.9
Regulation & safety 4.0 3.5
Fees & deposit 3.5 4.5
Platform & assets 4.0 3.5
User support 3.5 4.0
Trust score76/10076/100
Minimum depositVaries by account type — check the official siteVaries by account type — check the official site
Demo accountAvailableAvailable
PlatformsCapital.com web/mobile platform, MetaTrader 4, TradingView (integrated)MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView
Fee modelSpread model (no commission) — variesVery low commission — among the lowest in the industry
Pros & cons
- Tier-1 regulation (FCA/CySEC/ASIC) + a modern AI-powered platform
- Thousands of CFD markets + MT4 & TradingView
- Beginner-friendly interface + education
- CFDs only (no real stocks/asset ownership)
- Entity/product availability differs per region
- Leveraged CFDs are high-risk
- One of the lowest costs in the industry (very small commission)
- ASIC regulation + wide platform selection
- Well-regarded support
- A relatively new (2019) & small broker
- Many clients via the VFSC Vanuatu entity (light regulation)
- Leverage is high-risk
Regulation at a glance
Capital.com
Regulated by the FCA (UK), CySEC (Cyprus), ASIC (Australia), SCB (Bahamas), FSA (Seychelles). CFD focus with an AI-powered platform.
Fusion Markets
Australian (2019) — regulated by ASIC (Australia), VFSC (Vanuatu for the global entity), FSA (Seychelles).