Forex.com vs Fusion Markets: which broker is better in 2026?
We compare Forex.com and Fusion Markets — two forex & CFD brokers — side by side across regulation, fees, platforms, minimum deposit, and our editorial scores. Based on our overall editorial score, Fusion Markets edges ahead (3.9/5), but the right choice depends on what matters most to you — check the breakdown below.
Side-by-side comparison
CriteriaForex.comFusion Markets
Overall score 3.8 3.9
Regulation & safety 4.0 3.5
Fees & deposit 3.5 4.5
Platform & assets 4.0 3.5
User support 3.5 4.0
Trust score76/10076/100
Minimum depositVaries by account type — check the official siteVaries by account type — check the official site
Demo accountAvailableAvailable
PlatformsProprietary web/desktop platform, MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, TradingView (integrated), Mobile appMetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView
Fee modelSpread model or spread + commission (RAW/Commission account) — varies per region/account; exact figures not yet verifiedVery low commission — among the lowest in the industry
Pros & cons
- Backed by StoneX Group (US public company Nasdaq: SNEX) + a strict US market license
- Full platform selection: proprietary + MT4/MT5 + TradingView
- Broad instrument coverage & established liquidity
- Fees/spreads aren't always the cheapest compared to raw ECN brokers
- Product availability differs per entity/region
- Leveraged products are high-risk
- One of the lowest costs in the industry (very small commission)
- ASIC regulation + wide platform selection
- Well-regarded support
- A relatively new (2019) & small broker
- Many clients via the VFSC Vanuatu entity (light regulation)
- Leverage is high-risk
Regulation at a glance
Forex.com
Part of StoneX Group, a US public company (Nasdaq: SNEX). Entities regulated by NFA/CFTC (US), FCA (UK), ASIC (Australia), IIROC (Canada), and others per region.
Fusion Markets
Australian (2019) — regulated by ASIC (Australia), VFSC (Vanuatu for the global entity), FSA (Seychelles).