FP Markets vs Fusion Markets: which broker is better in 2026?
We compare FP Markets and Fusion Markets — two forex & CFD brokers — side by side across regulation, fees, platforms, minimum deposit, and our editorial scores. Based on our overall editorial score, Fusion Markets edges ahead (3.9/5), but the right choice depends on what matters most to you — check the breakdown below.
Side-by-side comparison
CriteriaFP MarketsFusion Markets
Overall score 3.8 3.9
Regulation & safety 3.5 3.5
Fees & deposit 4.0 4.5
Platform & assets 4.0 3.5
User support 3.5 4.0
Trust score74/10076/100
Minimum depositVaries by account type — check the official siteVaries by account type — check the official site
Demo accountAvailableAvailable
PlatformsMetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, IRESSMetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView
Fee modelRaw spread + commission (Raw) or Standard; competitiveVery low commission — among the lowest in the industry
Pros & cons
- ASIC/CySEC regulation + full platform selection (including IRESS for stocks)
- Competitive raw spreads
- Operating since 2005
- The global entity (St. Vincent) is less strict than ASIC/CySEC
- Mid-size brand, not a tier-1 giant
- Leverage is high-risk
- One of the lowest costs in the industry (very small commission)
- ASIC regulation + wide platform selection
- Well-regarded support
- A relatively new (2019) & small broker
- Many clients via the VFSC Vanuatu entity (light regulation)
- Leverage is high-risk
Regulation at a glance
FP Markets
Australian (2005) — regulated by ASIC (Australia), CySEC (Cyprus), FSA (St. Vincent for the global entity).
Fusion Markets
Australian (2019) — regulated by ASIC (Australia), VFSC (Vanuatu for the global entity), FSA (Seychelles).