FP Markets vs FXTM (ForexTime): which broker is better in 2026?
We compare FP Markets and FXTM (ForexTime) — two forex & CFD brokers — side by side across regulation, fees, platforms, minimum deposit, and our editorial scores. Based on our overall editorial score, FP Markets edges ahead (3.8/5), but the right choice depends on what matters most to you — check the breakdown below.
Side-by-side comparison
CriteriaFP MarketsFXTM (ForexTime)
Overall score 3.8 3.5
Regulation & safety 3.5 3.0
Fees & deposit 4.0 3.5
Platform & assets 4.0 4.0
User support 3.5 3.5
Trust score74/10068/100
Minimum depositVaries by account type — check the official siteVaries by account type — check the official site
Demo accountAvailableAvailable
PlatformsMetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, IRESSMetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5
Fee modelRaw spread + commission (Raw) or Standard; competitiveStandard / advantage spread; figures vary
Pros & cons
- ASIC/CySEC regulation + full platform selection (including IRESS for stocks)
- Competitive raw spreads
- Operating since 2005
- The global entity (St. Vincent) is less strict than ASIC/CySEC
- Mid-size brand, not a tier-1 giant
- Leverage is high-risk
- Strong presence in Africa & Asia; good education
- FCA/CySEC licenses for certain entities
- MT4/MT5 + various account types
- Many retail clients via the Mauritius entity (lighter regulation)
- Standard spread is not the cheapest
- Leverage is high-risk
Regulation at a glance
FP Markets
Australian (2005) — regulated by ASIC (Australia), CySEC (Cyprus), FSA (St. Vincent for the global entity).
FXTM (ForexTime)
ForexTime (FXTM) — regulated by the FCA (UK), CySEC (Cyprus), FSCA (South Africa), FSC (Mauritius). Many clients via the Mauritius entity.