FP Markets vs Trading 212: which broker is better in 2026?
We compare FP Markets and Trading 212 — two forex & CFD brokers — side by side across regulation, fees, platforms, minimum deposit, and our editorial scores. Both score evenly overall — the right choice depends on which criteria matter most to you.
Side-by-side comparison
CriteriaFP MarketsTrading 212
Overall score 3.8 3.8
Regulation & safety 3.5 4.0
Fees & deposit 4.0 4.0
Platform & assets 4.0 3.5
User support 3.5 3.5
Trust score74/10077/100
Minimum depositVaries by account type — check the official siteVaries by account type — check the official site
Demo accountAvailableAvailable
PlatformsMetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, IRESSTrading 212 app (web/mobile)
Fee modelRaw spread + commission (Raw) or Standard; competitiveCommission-free stocks & ETFs (Invest); CFDs via spread
Pros & cons
- ASIC/CySEC regulation + full platform selection (including IRESS for stocks)
- Competitive raw spreads
- Operating since 2005
- The global entity (St. Vincent) is less strict than ASIC/CySEC
- Mid-size brand, not a tier-1 giant
- Leverage is high-risk
- Regulated by the FCA + FSC; commission-free stocks & ETFs
- Very beginner-friendly app & popular in Europe
- Good for long-term investing (Invest) + separate CFDs
- CFD features are more limited than dedicated forex brokers (no MT4/MT5)
- Not for pro/algorithmic traders
- Leveraged CFDs remain high-risk
Regulation at a glance
FP Markets
Australian (2005) — regulated by ASIC (Australia), CySEC (Cyprus), FSA (St. Vincent for the global entity).
Trading 212
Regulated by the FCA (UK) & FSC (Bulgaria). Trading 212 UK Ltd is supervised by the FCA. Popular for commission-free stocks & ETFs.