Fusion Markets vs Trading 212: which broker is better in 2026?
We compare Fusion Markets and Trading 212 — two forex & CFD brokers — side by side across regulation, fees, platforms, minimum deposit, and our editorial scores. Based on our overall editorial score, Fusion Markets edges ahead (3.9/5), but the right choice depends on what matters most to you — check the breakdown below.
Side-by-side comparison
CriteriaFusion MarketsTrading 212
Overall score 3.9 3.8
Regulation & safety 3.5 4.0
Fees & deposit 4.5 4.0
Platform & assets 3.5 3.5
User support 4.0 3.5
Trust score76/10077/100
Minimum depositVaries by account type — check the official siteVaries by account type — check the official site
Demo accountAvailableAvailable
PlatformsMetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingViewTrading 212 app (web/mobile)
Fee modelVery low commission — among the lowest in the industryCommission-free stocks & ETFs (Invest); CFDs via spread
Pros & cons
- One of the lowest costs in the industry (very small commission)
- ASIC regulation + wide platform selection
- Well-regarded support
- A relatively new (2019) & small broker
- Many clients via the VFSC Vanuatu entity (light regulation)
- Leverage is high-risk
- Regulated by the FCA + FSC; commission-free stocks & ETFs
- Very beginner-friendly app & popular in Europe
- Good for long-term investing (Invest) + separate CFDs
- CFD features are more limited than dedicated forex brokers (no MT4/MT5)
- Not for pro/algorithmic traders
- Leveraged CFDs remain high-risk
Regulation at a glance
Fusion Markets
Australian (2019) — regulated by ASIC (Australia), VFSC (Vanuatu for the global entity), FSA (Seychelles).
Trading 212
Regulated by the FCA (UK) & FSC (Bulgaria). Trading 212 UK Ltd is supervised by the FCA. Popular for commission-free stocks & ETFs.