IC Markets vs Interactive Brokers: which broker is better in 2026?
We compare IC Markets and Interactive Brokers — two forex & CFD brokers — side by side across regulation, fees, platforms, minimum deposit, and our editorial scores. Based on our overall editorial score, Interactive Brokers edges ahead (4.3/5), but the right choice depends on what matters most to you — check the breakdown below.
Side-by-side comparison
Pros & cons
- One of the most popular raw-spread ECN brokers for scalping/algo trading (very low costs)
- Very complete platform selection (MT4/MT5/cTrader/TradingView)
- Regulated by ASIC (Australia) + CySEC for certain entities
- A class-action record (reported since 2024) alleging it misled investors — no verdict yet, but a relevant public fact
- Many clients via offshore entities (Seychelles/Bahamas)
- Leverage is high-risk
- Top-tier regulation & transparency — a US public company (Nasdaq: IBKR) supervised by SEC/FINRA/CFTC + many global regulators
- Among the cheapest costs in the industry; very broad global market access
- Very powerful TWS platform & API for professional/algorithmic traders
- The TWS platform has a steep learning curve — less beginner-friendly
- Customer support is more self-service (not hand-holding), suited to technical users
- Interface & account structure can feel complex at first
Regulation at a glance
Exact license numbers not yet verified — the official site mentions multi-regulation but the detailed regulation page was inaccessible during our check. Verify directly with the regulator (ASIC, CySEC, or the Seychelles FSA depending on the entity) before signing up.
A US public company (Nasdaq: IBKR) with entities regulated by SEC/FINRA/CFTC (US), FCA (UK), IIROC (Canada), MAS (Singapore), ASIC (Australia), the Central Bank of Ireland, and others. One of the most regulated & financially transparent brokers.