OANDA vs Plus500: which broker is better in 2026?
We compare OANDA and Plus500 — two forex & CFD brokers — side by side across regulation, fees, platforms, minimum deposit, and our editorial scores. Based on our overall editorial score, OANDA edges ahead (4.0/5), but the right choice depends on what matters most to you — check the breakdown below.
Side-by-side comparison
Pros & cons
- Very strong & rare regulation — licensed in the US (NFA/CFTC) plus FCA/ASIC/MAS/IIROC
- Respected reputation for price data & execution; strong trading API for automation
- Flexible platform choice: proprietary + MT4 + TradingView
- Not the cheapest for high volume compared to raw ECN brokers
- Product availability (e.g. crypto CFDs) differs per region/entity
- Leveraged products remain high-risk
- Public company (LSE FTSE 250) with layered regulation (FCA UK, MAS Singapore)
- Simple, beginner-friendly proprietary platform, no separate commission (spread model)
- Broad instrument coverage: share/forex/commodity/index CFDs + futures & share dealing
- Historical note: £205,128 FCA fine (2012) for inaccurate transaction reporting + a past dispute with the Belgian regulator (FSMA)
- Own platform only — no MT4/MT5/cTrader for advanced traders
- Leveraged CFD model is high-risk (most retail accounts lose money — standard industry warning)
Regulation at a glance
Operates multiple entities with strict oversight per region: NFA/CFTC (US), FCA (UK), ASIC (Australia), MAS (Singapore), IIROC (Canada). One of the few retail brokers licensed in the US market.
Listed on the London Stock Exchange (FTSE 250). The UK entity (Plus500UK Ltd) is supervised by the FCA; the Singapore entity (Plus500SG) holds a Capital Markets Services license from MAS. Check which entity serves your country — regulation differs per entity.