ThinkMarkets vs Trading 212: which broker is better in 2026?
We compare ThinkMarkets and Trading 212 — two forex & CFD brokers — side by side across regulation, fees, platforms, minimum deposit, and our editorial scores. Both score evenly overall — the right choice depends on which criteria matter most to you.
Side-by-side comparison
CriteriaThinkMarketsTrading 212
Overall score 3.8 3.8
Regulation & safety 3.5 4.0
Fees & deposit 4.0 4.0
Platform & assets 4.0 3.5
User support 3.5 3.5
Trust score74/10077/100
Minimum depositVaries by account type — check the official siteVaries by account type — check the official site
Demo accountAvailableAvailable
PlatformsThinkTrader, MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5Trading 212 app (web/mobile)
Fee modelThinkZero (raw) or Standard account; competitiveCommission-free stocks & ETFs (Invest); CFDs via spread
Pros & cons
- FCA/ASIC/CySEC regulation + its own ThinkTrader platform
- Competitive spreads (ThinkZero raw account)
- MT4/MT5 available
- Smaller brand than tier-1 giants
- Entity availability differs per region
- Leverage is high-risk
- Regulated by the FCA + FSC; commission-free stocks & ETFs
- Very beginner-friendly app & popular in Europe
- Good for long-term investing (Invest) + separate CFDs
- CFD features are more limited than dedicated forex brokers (no MT4/MT5)
- Not for pro/algorithmic traders
- Leveraged CFDs remain high-risk
Regulation at a glance
ThinkMarkets
Regulated by the FCA (UK), ASIC (Australia), CySEC (Cyprus), FSCA (South Africa), FSA (Japan for the related entity). Has its own ThinkTrader platform.
Trading 212
Regulated by the FCA (UK) & FSC (Bulgaria). Trading 212 UK Ltd is supervised by the FCA. Popular for commission-free stocks & ETFs.